Friday, 22 February 2013

Double Page Final Draft


This is the only one that i actually worked hard on and i'm quite happy with how it turned out, but i do see room for improvment which no matter how much i try, it never works. Mostly to do with the text, it looks really cramped and keeps going over white backgrounds making it difficult to read but it is the best i can do with it no matter how hard i work on it so this is the best i can do. Besides it is quite a minor flaw in my opinion.

Double Page Draft #2


This is my 2nd draft, although i do think this is much better than my first one, i still think it's pretty crap, the writting is practically unreadable here and the picture is just me with a filter put over it.

Double Page Draft #1



Here is my first draft for my double page spread, this one is pretty crap and really i didn't try very hard for this one and i just rushed through it.

Tuesday, 19 February 2013

Front Cover Feedback

Contents Page Feedback

Peer Feedback

The strengths of this contents page are the text and the main image. The image looks professional and the text stands out, attracting the eye. I also like the layout of the smaller images along the side.
It could be improved by taking a bigger range of photographs of a few different people.

Amelia R

Feedback

Emma Barker

Overall I think you should improve the colours within your page, make them stand out more or use different contrasting colours. I think you need to change the background as there is too much white within the page, maybe change some of the blocks of white to a different red or yellow colour. Overall I like your font type and think the page is interesting. I think also the use of the magazine name is very good and clever. :)

Contents Page Peer Feedback

I like your contents page I think it fits together really well however  the main section is spread out  a lot an I think if you were too bring it together it would really work.